Yield & Lending
What Is Impermanent Loss in DeFi?
Learn what impermanent loss is, how it affects liquidity providers in DeFi, and strategies to minimize its impact on your crypto holdings.
Learn what restaking is, how it extends proof-of-stake security to new protocols, and what risks and rewards restaking offers to crypto holders.
Restaking is a relatively new concept in the crypto ecosystem that extends the security guarantees of proof-of-stake networks to additional protocols and services. It allows staked assets to secure not just the base blockchain but also other decentralized services built on top of it. Think of it as recycling your staked capital to do double (or triple) duty.
The concept gained major traction in 2023 and 2024, primarily through EigenLayer on Ethereum. But the principles behind restaking apply broadly and are being explored across multiple blockchain ecosystems. If you are interested in maximizing the utility and yield of your staked assets, understanding restaking is essential.
To understand restaking, you first need to understand the challenge it addresses. In a proof-of-stake system, validators lock up tokens as collateral to help secure the network. If they behave honestly, they earn rewards. If they misbehave, their stake can be slashed (partially destroyed).
This system works well for the base layer blockchain, but what about all the other decentralized services that need security? Oracles, bridges, data availability layers, rollups, keeper networks, and many other services need economic security to function trustlessly. Traditionally, each of these services had to bootstrap its own set of validators and its own staked capital — an expensive and fragmented process.
Restaking solves this by allowing validators who have already staked their tokens on the base layer to "restake" those same tokens to secure additional services. Instead of each service needing to attract its own independent pool of staked capital, they can tap into the existing security of a large proof-of-stake network like Ethereum.
The mechanics vary by implementation, but the core idea is consistent:
You stake tokens on the base layer (for example, staking ETH to become an Ethereum validator or holding liquid staking tokens like stETH).
You opt into restaking by delegating your staked position to a restaking protocol like EigenLayer. This does not require unstaking — your ETH remains staked and continues to earn base staking rewards.
The restaking protocol assigns your stake to one or more Actively Validated Services (AVSs). These are the protocols and services that need economic security.
You earn additional rewards from the AVSs you help secure, on top of your base staking rewards.
You accept additional slashing conditions. If you (or your chosen operator) misbehave according to the rules of any AVS you have opted into, your restaked capital can be slashed.
Understanding the distinction is important:
| Aspect | Staking | Restaking |
|---|---|---|
| What it secures | Base layer blockchain | Additional services (AVSs) |
| Rewards | Base staking rewards | Additional rewards on top of staking |
| Slashing risk | Only from base layer rules | From base layer AND AVS rules |
| Capital efficiency | One use for staked capital | Multiple uses for same capital |
| Complexity | Relatively simple | More complex, more moving parts |
EigenLayer is the most prominent restaking protocol and the one that popularized the concept. Built on Ethereum, it allows ETH stakers and liquid staking token (LST) holders to restake their assets to secure a growing list of AVSs.
EigenLayer introduced the term "Actively Validated Service" to describe any decentralized service that requires a distributed set of operators with economic stake. Examples include:
Each AVS defines its own rules for validation, reward distribution, and slashing. Restakers choose which AVSs to support based on the reward-to-risk ratio.
Just as liquid staking created tokens like stETH that represent staked ETH while keeping it liquid, liquid restaking has spawned a new category of tokens: Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs).
LRTs like ezETH (Renzo), rsETH (KelpDAO), pufETH (Puffer), and eETH (ether.fi) represent restaked positions. They allow you to earn both staking and restaking rewards while maintaining a liquid, tradeable token that can be used elsewhere in DeFi — as collateral for borrowing, in liquidity pools, or in other yield strategies.
This composability is powerful but introduces additional layers of risk. Each LRT depends on the underlying staking, restaking, and AVS infrastructure all functioning correctly.
The primary appeal of restaking is increased capital efficiency and yield:
Restaking is not a free lunch. The additional yield comes with additional risks that every participant should understand:
By opting into multiple AVSs, you expose your staked capital to multiple sets of slashing conditions. A bug or attack on any single AVS could result in the loss of your restaked funds. The more AVSs you secure, the larger the surface area for potential slashing.
Restaking involves interacting with additional smart contracts beyond the base staking protocol. Each additional contract is a potential point of failure. The restaking protocol itself, the AVS contracts, and any liquid restaking token contracts all add layers of smart contract risk.
Most restakers delegate to professional operators rather than running their own infrastructure. If your chosen operator makes errors or acts maliciously, your stake could be slashed. Evaluating operator quality and reliability is an important part of restaking.
While LRTs provide liquidity, there can be periods where the secondary market price of an LRT deviates from the value of the underlying restaked assets. During market stress, LRT holders may find it difficult to exit their positions at fair value.
If restaking becomes widespread enough, a cascading failure across multiple AVSs could theoretically stress the base layer's economic security. This systemic risk is a topic of ongoing discussion among Ethereum researchers.
While EigenLayer pioneered the concept on Ethereum, restaking is being explored on other chains too. Babylon Protocol, for example, brings a form of restaking to Bitcoin, allowing BTC holders to participate in securing proof-of-stake networks without wrapping or bridging their Bitcoin.
Solana, Cosmos, and other ecosystems are also exploring shared security models that share similarities with restaking.
Restaking is best suited for participants who:
If you are looking for a simpler way to use your crypto productively, lending and borrowing platforms offer a more straightforward path. For Bitcoin holders specifically, Borrow by Sats Terminal provides a way to use your BTC as collateral and borrow stablecoins at rates aggregated from multiple lending protocols. There is no staking complexity, no slashing risk, and no need to understand AVS mechanics — just straightforward, transparent borrowing against your Bitcoin.
Restaking represents a significant evolution in how blockchain security is shared and allocated. By pooling economic security across many services, it has the potential to dramatically reduce the cost and friction of launching new decentralized infrastructure.
However, the space is still young, and the risks are not yet fully understood. As with any emerging DeFi primitive, participants should start small, diversify across operators and AVSs, and stay informed about the rapidly evolving landscape.
Whether you choose to explore restaking for additional yield or prefer the simplicity of lending and borrowing through platforms like Borrow by Sats Terminal, the most important thing is to understand the risks and rewards before committing your capital.
Common Questions
Restaking means taking tokens you have already staked on a blockchain and using that same staked position to provide security for additional protocols and services. This lets you earn extra rewards on top of your base staking rewards, but it also exposes you to additional slashing risks from those extra services.
Related Questions
Yield & Lending
Learn what impermanent loss is, how it affects liquidity providers in DeFi, and strategies to minimize its impact on your crypto holdings.
Yield & Lending
Discover how DeFi protocols generate yield through lending, liquidity provision, staking, and token incentives. Understand where the returns actually come from.
Crypto Borrowing
Learn what loan liquidation means in crypto lending, how it works in DeFi and CeFi, what triggers it, and practical strategies to avoid getting liquidated on your Bitcoin-backed loan.
Crypto Borrowing
Understand over-collateralization in crypto lending: why you must deposit more collateral than you borrow, how it protects lenders, and what it means for your borrowing strategy.