Sats Terminal Borrow
TradeBorrowEarn

Get Started

Sats Terminal Borrow

Sats Terminal Borrow is a non-custodial Bitcoin loan marketplace that aggregates major on-chain and off-chain providers. Compare rates, fees, and terms in one place and get stablecoins with a simple, transparent flow. You keep control of your assets while we orchestrate wallet setup, bridging, and smart contract execution.

Resources

Home

Borrow

Earn

Learn

Blog

Glossary

Learn

FAQ

Company

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Blog/Crypto Lending Platform

Top 10 Crypto Lending Platforms in 2025

Compare the top 10 crypto lending platforms in 2025. Find the best rates, features, and security across DeFi and CeFi options for borrowers.

21 min read
Arkadii KaminskyiArkadii Kaminskyi
Arkadii Kaminskyi

Arkadii Kaminskyi

Head of Operations at Sats Terminal

Head of Operations at Sats Terminal with 5 years of experience in crypto. Specializes in DeFi, yield farming, and borrowing — has reviewed 50+ crypto products.

DeFiCrypto LendingYield FarmingBitcoin
View LinkedIn Profile→
March 27, 2026
Top 10 Crypto Lending Platforms in 2025

The crypto lending market has matured significantly over the past few years, and choosing the right crypto lending platform in 2025 is more important than ever. Whether you want to borrow stablecoins against your Bitcoin, earn yield on idle crypto assets, or access liquidity without triggering a taxable sale, the platform you pick can make or break your experience. Interest rates, collateral requirements, security track records, and user experience all vary dramatically from one protocol to the next.

In this comprehensive guide, we rank and review the top 10 crypto lending platforms available today. We cover decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, centralized finance (CeFi) services, and aggregators that help you compare across all of them. By the end, you will know exactly which crypto lending platform fits your goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio size.

Before diving in, it helps to understand how rates are determined and what separates a good deal from a bad one. Our guide on crypto lending rates in 2025 breaks that down in detail. And if you are weighing centralized versus decentralized options, our CeFi vs DeFi crypto lending comparison is a must-read companion piece.


How We Evaluated Each Crypto Lending Platform

We assessed each platform across the following criteria:

  • Security and track record — Has the protocol been audited? Has it suffered exploits or insolvency events?
  • Supported assets — Which cryptocurrencies can you use as collateral or borrow?
  • Interest rates — What are typical borrowing and lending APYs?
  • Loan-to-value (LTV) ratios — How much can you borrow relative to your collateral?
  • User experience — Is the platform accessible to beginners or geared toward advanced users?
  • Transparency — Are reserves verifiable on-chain? Are terms clearly disclosed?
  • Regulatory standing — Is the platform compliant in major jurisdictions?

With those factors in mind, here are the top 10 crypto lending platforms for 2025.


1. Aave — The DeFi Blue Chip

Overview

Aave is the largest decentralized lending protocol by total value locked (TVL), consistently holding over $15 billion in deposits across multiple blockchain networks. Launched in 2020 as a successor to ETHLend, Aave pioneered innovations like flash loans, rate switching between variable and stable rates, and multi-chain deployment. In 2025 it operates on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Base, and several other networks through Aave V3.

Key Features

  • Multi-chain deployment — Access liquidity on 10+ networks with unified governance.
  • Efficiency mode (eMode) — Borrow correlated assets at up to 97% LTV (for example, borrowing USDC against USDT).
  • Flash loans — Borrow and repay within a single transaction for arbitrage or liquidation strategies.
  • GHO stablecoin — Aave's native overcollateralized stablecoin offers discounted borrow rates for stkAAVE holders.
  • Governance-controlled risk parameters — Community-driven risk management via on-chain proposals.

Supported Assets

Over 100 assets across all deployments, including ETH, WBTC, cbBTC, USDC, USDT, DAI, LINK, and many long-tail tokens in isolated markets.

Typical Rates

Variable borrow rates for stablecoins generally range from 3% to 8% APY depending on utilization. ETH borrowing costs typically sit between 1% and 4%. Supply rates for stablecoins often land in the 2% to 6% range.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: Battle-tested security with multiple audits, massive liquidity, fully non-custodial, governance transparency, multi-chain flexibility.
  • Cons: Gas costs on Ethereum mainnet can be high for small loans, variable rates can spike during high-utilization periods, no fiat on/off ramps.

Best For

DeFi-native users who value self-custody, transparency, and deep liquidity. Ideal for borrowers comfortable managing wallets and interacting with smart contracts directly.


2. Morpho — The Optimized Lending Layer

Overview

Morpho started as an optimizer sitting on top of Aave and Compound, matching lenders and borrowers peer-to-peer to offer better rates for both sides. In 2024-2025, Morpho evolved into Morpho Blue, a fully independent, permissionless lending primitive. Morpho Blue lets anyone create isolated lending markets with custom parameters — any collateral asset, any loan asset, any oracle, and any LTV. Curators (like Gauntlet, Steakhouse, and others) build pre-configured vaults on top of Morpho Blue for users who prefer a managed experience.

Key Features

  • Permissionless market creation — Any pair, any oracle, any risk parameters.
  • Immutable, minimal smart contracts — Only ~650 lines of code, reducing audit surface and exploit risk.
  • Curator vaults — Managed strategies that allocate deposits across multiple Morpho Blue markets for optimized yield.
  • No governance dependencies — Markets are autonomous once created; no DAO votes required to adjust parameters.
  • Better rate matching — Peer-to-peer matching can offer improved rates compared to pool-based models.

Supported Assets

Because market creation is permissionless, virtually any ERC-20 token can be used. Popular markets include WBTC/USDC, ETH/USDC, wstETH/ETH, and various LST pairs. Morpho is deployed on Ethereum and Base.

Typical Rates

Borrowing rates for stablecoins against blue-chip collateral (ETH, WBTC) often range from 2% to 7%. The peer-to-peer matching can offer rates 0.5% to 2% better than comparable pools on Aave or Compound.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: Minimal, audited code with a tiny attack surface, often better rates than competitors, fully permissionless, growing rapidly in TVL.
  • Cons: Newer protocol with a shorter track record than Aave, understanding the curator layer adds complexity, currently limited to Ethereum and Base.

Best For

DeFi power users and institutions looking for optimized rates and capital efficiency. Also excellent for projects that want to bootstrap their own lending markets without governance overhead.


3. Compound — The Pioneer of DeFi Lending

Overview

Compound Finance launched in 2018 and effectively created the DeFi lending category. Its algorithmic interest rate model — where rates adjust automatically based on supply and demand — became the blueprint for nearly every lending protocol that followed. Compound V3 (also called Comet) simplified the architecture to a single-borrowable-asset model, focusing on USDC as the primary borrowable asset with multiple collateral types.

Key Features

  • Single-asset borrowing model — V3 focuses each market on one borrowable asset, reducing cross-asset contagion risk.
  • Algorithmic interest rates — Transparent, on-chain rate curves visible to all users.
  • COMP token incentives — Borrowers and lenders can still earn COMP governance tokens, effectively reducing net borrow costs.
  • Multi-chain presence — Deployed on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Base, and Optimism.

Supported Assets

Collateral assets in V3 include ETH, WBTC, cbBTC, COMP, LINK, UNI, and wstETH. The primary borrowable asset is USDC, with separate markets for USDT and ETH on some chains.

Typical Rates

USDC borrow rates typically range from 3% to 7%. When factoring in COMP rewards, the effective rate can be 1% to 3% lower depending on market conditions.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: Longest DeFi track record, heavily audited, simplified V3 design reduces systemic risk, COMP incentives reduce effective borrowing costs.
  • Cons: Smaller TVL than Aave, fewer supported assets, less flexibility due to single-borrowable-asset design, governance process can be slow.

Best For

Users who prioritize a time-tested protocol and want to borrow stablecoins with minimal complexity. The COMP incentives make it attractive for cost-conscious borrowers.


4. MakerDAO / Sky — The Original DeFi Bank

Overview

MakerDAO pioneered decentralized lending by creating DAI, the first decentralized stablecoin backed by crypto collateral, in 2017. In 2024, MakerDAO rebranded to Sky Protocol, introducing the USDS stablecoin and the SKY governance token alongside the legacy MKR and DAI tokens. The Spark Protocol sub-DAO now handles the primary lending frontend, functioning similarly to Aave but with direct access to Sky's DAI/USDS minting engine.

Key Features

  • Direct stablecoin minting — Borrow DAI or USDS directly by depositing collateral into vaults, with no counterparty on the other side.
  • Spark Protocol — A full-featured lending platform (forked from Aave V3) offering competitive stablecoin borrow rates.
  • Real-world asset (RWA) backing — A portion of DAI is backed by US Treasuries and other off-chain assets, providing yield and stability.
  • Multiple collateral types — ETH, WBTC, stETH, and other assets can be used to mint DAI.
  • Savings rates — The DAI Savings Rate (DSR) and Sky Savings Rate (SSR) offer yields to stablecoin holders.

Supported Assets

ETH, WBTC, stETH, USDC (via the Peg Stability Module), and various LP tokens can serve as collateral. Borrowable assets are DAI and USDS.

Typical Rates

Borrow rates are set by governance and typically range from 2% to 8% depending on the vault type and collateral. The Spark lending market offers variable rates competitive with Aave.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: No counterparty risk on vault-based borrowing, deep history and proven stability, DSR/SSR provides yield on idle stablecoins, RWA integration is innovative.
  • Cons: Rebranding to Sky has caused confusion, governance complexity is significant, DAI peg has occasionally wobbled during extreme market stress, fewer collateral types than Aave.

Best For

Long-term DeFi participants who want to mint stablecoins against their crypto without relying on a lending pool counterparty. Also suitable for yield seekers via the savings rate products.


5. Nexo — CeFi With a Banking Experience

Overview

Nexo is one of the most established centralized crypto lending platforms, offering an experience that closely mirrors traditional banking. Founded in 2018, Nexo provides instant crypto-backed credit lines, an interest-earning account, and a Mastercard-linked card that lets you spend against your crypto collateral. Nexo holds multiple licenses and operates in over 200 jurisdictions, though US availability has been limited since 2023.

Key Features

  • Instant credit lines — Borrow fiat or stablecoins against 80+ cryptocurrencies with no fixed repayment schedule.
  • Nexo Card — Spend against your crypto holdings without selling, with cashback rewards.
  • Flexible repayment — No minimum payments, no fixed terms; repay at your own pace.
  • Insurance — Custodial assets are insured through partnerships with institutional-grade custodians.
  • Real-time audit attestations — Nexo provides regular proof-of-reserves via Armanino.

Supported Assets

Over 80 cryptocurrencies as collateral, including BTC, ETH, XRP, MATIC, DOT, ADA, and many more. Borrowable assets include USD, EUR, GBP, USDC, and USDT.

Typical Rates

Borrow rates range from 2.9% to 13.9% APR depending on your NEXO token holdings and loyalty tier. Top-tier Platinum users with high NEXO balances access the lowest rates. Earn rates on stablecoins range from 8% to 14% depending on tier and lock-up.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: Extremely user-friendly, no fixed repayment terms, broad asset support, Nexo Card is a genuine competitive advantage, strong regulatory posture.
  • Cons: Centralized and custodial (you give up control of your keys), limited US availability, best rates require locking NEXO tokens, CeFi counterparty risk remains.

Best For

Users outside the US who want a polished banking-like experience with crypto. Ideal if you prefer not to interact with DeFi smart contracts and want the convenience of a credit card backed by crypto.


6. Ledn — Bitcoin-Focused CeFi Lending

Overview

Ledn is a Canadian-based crypto lending platform that focuses heavily on Bitcoin. It differentiated itself by being one of the few CeFi lenders to survive the 2022 crypto credit crisis without freezing withdrawals. Ledn offers Bitcoin-backed loans as well as yield-earning accounts for BTC and USDC. In 2024-2025, Ledn expanded its product suite with dual-asset loans and improved transparency features.

Key Features

  • Bitcoin-backed loans — Borrow USD or USDC against BTC with competitive LTV ratios up to 50%.
  • Proof of Reserves — Ledn was the first crypto lender to complete a proof-of-reserves attestation, now conducted regularly.
  • B2X loans — A unique product that lets you double your Bitcoin exposure through a single transaction.
  • No early repayment penalties — Pay off your loan at any time without fees.
  • Institutional-grade custody — Assets held with regulated custodians.

Supported Assets

Primarily BTC and USDC. Ledn is deliberately focused on Bitcoin rather than trying to support every token.

Typical Rates

Bitcoin-backed loan rates typically range from 9% to 12% APR. Yield accounts offer variable returns on BTC and USDC, typically in the 1% to 4% range for BTC and 6% to 9% for USDC.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: Strong survival record through 2022 crisis, transparent proof of reserves, clean Bitcoin-focused product, B2X product is unique, available to US customers in many states.
  • Cons: Limited asset support beyond BTC and USDC, rates are not the most competitive in the market, CeFi counterparty risk, smaller company than Nexo.

Best For

Bitcoin holders who want a trusted CeFi lender with a proven track record and transparent operations. Particularly suitable for US-based borrowers who cannot access Nexo. For more on BTC-specific platforms, see our guide to the best crypto lending platforms for BTC.


7. Unchained Capital — Multi-Signature Bitcoin Lending

Overview

Unchained Capital takes a radically different approach to Bitcoin lending by using collaborative custody with multi-signature (multisig) technology. Instead of handing over your BTC to a custodian, Unchained loans use a 2-of-3 multisig vault where the borrower, Unchained, and a third-party key agent each hold one key. This means no single party can move the collateral unilaterally. Unchained surpassed $1 billion in Bitcoin-collateralized loans in 2024, marking it as a serious player in the space.

Key Features

  • Collaborative custody — 2-of-3 multisig vaults ensure no single party controls the collateral.
  • Bitcoin-only focus — Dedicated exclusively to Bitcoin, with deep expertise in BTC custody and lending.
  • IRA and inheritance solutions — Beyond lending, Unchained offers Bitcoin IRAs and inheritance planning with multisig security.
  • US-based and regulated — Fully US-domiciled, operating under applicable state regulations.
  • Transparent loan terms — Fixed-rate loans with clear terms, typically 12-month duration.

Supported Assets

Bitcoin only. No other assets are supported as collateral or for borrowing.

Typical Rates

Loan rates have been trending downward, typically ranging from 10% to 14% APR for standard loans. Higher loan amounts and institutional clients may negotiate better terms. LTV ratios generally cap at 40% to 50%.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: Industry-leading custody model reduces counterparty risk dramatically, Bitcoin-only focus means deep expertise, US-based and regulated, IRA integration is unique.
  • Cons: Higher rates than DeFi alternatives, Bitcoin-only limits flexibility, fixed loan terms mean less repayment flexibility, minimum loan sizes may be prohibitive for smaller borrowers.

Best For

Bitcoin holders who want the security of never fully surrendering their keys. Especially appealing to high-net-worth individuals and those who want their Bitcoin lending integrated with retirement planning.


8. Arch (Formerly Hodl Hodl Lend) — Peer-to-Peer Bitcoin Lending

Overview

Arch, previously known as Hodl Hodl Lend, is a peer-to-peer Bitcoin lending platform that uses multisig escrow to facilitate loans directly between borrowers and lenders. The platform itself never takes custody of any funds. Instead, BTC collateral is locked in a 2-of-3 multisig escrow where the borrower, lender, and Arch each hold one key. This makes it one of the most trust-minimized lending platforms available.

Key Features

  • True peer-to-peer model — Borrowers and lenders negotiate terms directly, including rate, duration, and LTV.
  • Non-custodial — Arch never holds user funds; multisig escrow protects all parties.
  • Flexible terms — Because terms are negotiated P2P, borrowers and lenders can find arrangements that suit both.
  • No KYC required — Arch does not require identity verification, preserving user privacy.
  • Global access — Available worldwide without geographic restrictions.

Supported Assets

Bitcoin as collateral. Loans are typically denominated in stablecoins (USDT, USDC) or other assets agreed upon by both parties.

Typical Rates

Rates vary widely since they are negotiated peer-to-peer. Typical ranges are 6% to 15% APR depending on market conditions, LTV, and loan duration. Shorter-term, lower-LTV loans tend to get better rates.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: Maximum privacy with no KYC, non-custodial multisig security, flexible negotiable terms, global access, no corporate counterparty risk.
  • Cons: Requires finding a matching lender (liquidity can be limited), less user-friendly than automated platforms, P2P negotiation takes time, dispute resolution is more complex.

Best For

Privacy-conscious Bitcoin holders who want the security of non-custodial lending without KYC requirements. Also suitable for borrowers who want maximum flexibility in negotiating custom loan terms.


9. Celsius Network — A Cautionary Tale

Overview

Celsius Network was once one of the largest centralized crypto lending platforms, boasting over $20 billion in assets under management at its peak in 2021. However, in June 2022, Celsius froze all withdrawals, and by July 2022 it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The collapse revealed severe mismanagement, including unsecured lending to risky counterparties, use of customer deposits for proprietary trading, and inadequate risk controls. In 2024, Celsius emerged from bankruptcy under the new entity Fahrenheit (backed by a consortium including Hut 8), distributing partial recoveries to creditors primarily in BTC and ETH.

Key Lessons

  • Counterparty risk in CeFi — Even large, well-known platforms can fail if they mismanage funds.
  • Proof of reserves matters — Celsius lacked transparent reserve reporting, making it impossible for users to assess risk.
  • Too-good-to-be-true yields — Celsius offered unsustainably high interest rates that required increasingly risky strategies to maintain.
  • Regulatory gaps — Operating without proper regulatory oversight enabled risk-taking that would not have been permitted under traditional financial regulation.

Current Status (2025)

The original Celsius platform is defunct. Creditors received partial distributions in 2024. The successor entity focuses on Bitcoin mining operations rather than lending. Users with outstanding claims should consult the bankruptcy court filings for the latest distribution information.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros (historically): High yields on deposits, user-friendly mobile app, wide asset support, no minimum deposits.
  • Cons: Bankrupt, users lost significant funds, demonstrated the worst-case scenario of CeFi counterparty risk, founder faced criminal charges.

Best For

No one — Celsius is no longer operational as a lending platform. We include it here as a critical reminder to evaluate the risks of CeFi platforms carefully and to always consider whether a platform's yield promises are sustainable.


10. Sats Terminal / Borrow by Sats Terminal — The Aggregator Approach

Overview

Rather than being a single lending protocol, Borrow by Sats Terminal is a crypto lending aggregator that lets you compare loan offers across multiple DeFi protocols and CeFi platforms from a single interface. Instead of visiting Aave, Morpho, Compound, and various CeFi lenders separately to compare rates, Sats Terminal pulls real-time data from across the market and shows you the best available terms for your specific borrowing needs.

Key Features

  • Multi-platform comparison — See rates, LTVs, and terms from DeFi protocols and CeFi lenders side by side.
  • Bitcoin-focused — Optimized for BTC holders who want to borrow against their Bitcoin.
  • Real-time rate data — Rates update continuously so you always see current market conditions.
  • Educational resources — Guides, comparisons, and tools to help borrowers understand their options.
  • Simplified onboarding — Access multiple protocols through a streamlined interface instead of navigating each platform independently.

Supported Assets

Aggregates listings across the platforms it integrates with. Focused primarily on BTC as collateral with stablecoin borrowing, but covers whatever the underlying platforms support.

Typical Rates

Because Sats Terminal is an aggregator, rates reflect the underlying platforms. The advantage is that you will always see the most competitive rate available across all integrated platforms, which can save significant money compared to using a single platform without comparison shopping.

Pros and Cons

  • Pros: Saves time comparing across platforms, helps you find the best rate, educational content helps beginners, reduces the risk of overpaying on interest.
  • Cons: You still execute on the underlying platform (Sats Terminal itself is not a lender), coverage depends on platform integrations, newer product still growing its integration list.

Best For

Anyone looking to borrow against crypto — especially Bitcoin — who wants to make sure they are getting the best available rate. Ideal for first-time borrowers who need help navigating the fragmented lending landscape, as well as experienced borrowers who want to save time. To learn more about how to choose the best crypto lending platform, start here.


Crypto Lending Platform Comparison Table

The table below summarizes the key features of each platform covered in this guide.

PlatformTypeKey AssetsTypical Borrow RateMax LTVCustodyKYC Required
AaveDeFiETH, WBTC, USDC, 100+3%–8%Up to 80%Non-custodialNo
MorphoDeFiETH, WBTC, USDC, any ERC-202%–7%Up to 86%Non-custodialNo
CompoundDeFiETH, WBTC, USDC, COMP3%–7%Up to 83%Non-custodialNo
MakerDAO / SkyDeFiETH, WBTC, stETH, DAI2%–8%Up to 80%Non-custodialNo
NexoCeFiBTC, ETH, 80+ tokens2.9%–13.9%Up to 50%CustodialYes
LednCeFiBTC, USDC9%–12%Up to 50%CustodialYes
Unchained CapitalCeFiBTC only10%–14%Up to 50%Collaborative (multisig)Yes
ArchP2PBTC collateral6%–15%NegotiableNon-custodial (multisig)No
Celsius NetworkCeFi (defunct)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Sats TerminalAggregatorBTC, varies by platformBest availableVariesVariesVaries

Key Trends Shaping Crypto Lending Platforms in 2025

The crypto lending landscape has changed dramatically since the bear market of 2022. Several trends are shaping how platforms compete in 2025:

Proof of reserves has become table stakes. After the collapse of Celsius, FTX, and other CeFi platforms, borrowers now demand transparent reserve reporting. Platforms like Ledn and Nexo that adopted proof-of-reserves attestations early have gained significant trust.

DeFi protocols continue to gain market share. Aave, Morpho, and Compound have all seen substantial TVL growth as users move away from opaque CeFi models. The transparency and composability of DeFi lending make it increasingly attractive, even for institutional borrowers.

Rate compression is benefiting borrowers. Competition among platforms has driven borrowing rates down across the board. As we discuss in our analysis of crypto lending rates, borrowers today have access to historically competitive terms.

Aggregation is becoming essential. With dozens of viable lending platforms operating across multiple chains, manually comparing rates is impractical. Tools like Sats Terminal that aggregate offers across platforms help borrowers find optimal terms without exhaustive manual research.

For a deeper dive into how specific platforms have been ranked and reviewed this year, check out our best crypto lending platforms 2025 roundup.


How to Choose the Right Crypto Lending Platform

Selecting the best crypto lending platform depends on your specific circumstances:

  • If security is your top priority: DeFi protocols like Aave or Morpho offer non-custodial lending where you never hand over your keys. For Bitcoin specifically, Unchained's multisig model provides collaborative custody.
  • If you want the lowest rates: Compare across DeFi protocols using an aggregator. Morpho often offers the most competitive rates, while Compound's COMP incentives can significantly reduce effective borrowing costs.
  • If you want simplicity: CeFi platforms like Nexo provide a banking-like experience with minimal technical complexity. No wallet management, no gas fees, just deposit and borrow.
  • If you want privacy: Arch (formerly Hodl Hodl Lend) offers no-KYC peer-to-peer lending with multisig security.
  • If you want to compare everything: Use an aggregator like Sats Terminal to see all your options in one place before committing to a platform.

For a complete framework on evaluating platforms, read our guide on how to choose the best crypto lending platform for you.


On this page

Common Questions

Unchained Capital takes a radically different approach to Bitcoin lending by using collaborative custody with multi-signature (multisig) technology. Instead of handing over your BTC to a custodian, Unchained loans use a 2-of-3 multisig vault where the borrower, Unchained, and a third-party key agent each hold one key. This means no single party can move the collateral unilaterally. Unchained surpassed $1 billion in Bitcoin-collateralized loans in 2024, marking it as a serious player in the space.